<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://cb.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Christian Bioethics - current issue</title>
<link>http://cb.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Christian Bioethics - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1744-4195</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>December 2009</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Christian Bioethics</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1380-3603</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/3/209?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/3/220?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/3/234?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/3/254?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/3/277?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://cb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/3/209?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Infinite without God: Modernity, Christianity, and Bioethics, Or Why Christianity must be Counter-Cultural in the Contemporary World]]></title>
<link>http://cb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/3/209?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hinkley, A. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:01:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cb/cbp021</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Infinite without God: Modernity, Christianity, and Bioethics, Or Why Christianity must be Counter-Cultural in the Contemporary World]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Journal of Christian Bioethics Inc</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>219</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/3/220?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Failed Search for the Neutral in the Secular: Public Bioethics in the Face of the Culture Wars]]></title>
<link>http://cb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/3/220?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Public bioethics focuses on deliberating about, recommending, or establishing social policies or practices concerning health care and biotechnology. A brace of premises underlies much of the work of public bioethics. First, there is the view that, if one approaches reality and human life as if both were without ultimate significance, one will find that one shares a common public bioethics. That is, if one abstains not only from any religious concerns, but even from philosophical reflections on the circumstance that life might have ultimate meaning, one will be able to articulate a common neutral moral perspective that all persons can share and that can be the basis of a common public bioethics. The second premise is that the controversies in bioethics arise from the presence of religious belief, especially Christian belief, which supports a set of moral commitments that generate controversies that make the framing of public policy difficult. The view is that there is significant disagreement among persons who hold religious positions, particularly Christians, and that in public bioethics we should strive to eliminate these controversies by relying on a neutral moral framework. This paper documents and challenges these premises. It demonstrates that Christian bioethics finds itself already embedded in the field of secular moral controversy before it adds the perspectives it brings.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iltis, A. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:01:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cb/cbp018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Failed Search for the Neutral in the Secular: Public Bioethics in the Face of the Culture Wars]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Journal of Christian Bioethics Inc</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>233</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>220</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/3/234?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Moral Pluralism, the Crisis of Secular Bioethics, and the Divisive Character of Christian Bioethics: Taking the Culture Wars Seriously]]></title>
<link>http://cb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/3/234?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Moral pluralism is a reality. It is grounded, in part, in the intractable pluralism of secular morality and bioethics. There is a wide gulf that separates secular bioethics from Christian bioethics. Christian bioethics, unlike secular bioethics, understand that morality is about coming into a relationship with God. Orthodox Christian bioethics, moreover, understands that the impersonal set of moral principles and goals in secular morality gives a distorted account of the moral life. Therefore, Traditional Christian bioethics is separated from bioethics by a radical difference in paradigms.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Engelhardt, H. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:01:08 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cb/cbp019</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Moral Pluralism, the Crisis of Secular Bioethics, and the Divisive Character of Christian Bioethics: Taking the Culture Wars Seriously]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Journal of Christian Bioethics Inc</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>253</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>234</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/3/254?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Biopsychosociospiritual Medicine and Other Political Schemes]]></title>
<link>http://cb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/3/254?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In the mid-1970s, the biomedical model of medicine gave way to the biopsychosocial model of medicine; it was billed as a more comprehensive and compassionate model of medicine. After more than a century of disentangling medicine from religion, the medicine and spirituality movement is attempting to bring religion and spirituality back into medicine. It is doing so under a biopsychosociospiritual model. I unpack one model for allowing religion back into medicine called the RCOPE. RCOPE is an instrument designed to categorize religion and spirituality as psychological coping mechanisms. I explore how such instruments are related to the history of statistical measurement and demonstrate the political impetus that governs such enterprises. The biopsychosociospiritual medicine is billed as a more holistic and comprehensive model. This new model of medicine offers total care. However, I demonstrate how this total care becomes totalizing, indeed totalitarian, admitting religion and spirituality back into the fold of medicine under a new secularized medical control.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bishop, J. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:01:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cb/cbp017</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biopsychosociospiritual Medicine and Other Political Schemes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Journal of Christian Bioethics Inc</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>276</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>254</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/3/277?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Religion without God, Social Justice without Christian Charity, and Other Dimensions of the Culture Wars]]></title>
<link>http://cb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/15/3/277?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A truly Christian bioethics challenges the nature, substance, and application of secular morality, dividing Christians from non-Christians, accenting central moral differences, and providing content-full forthrightly Christian guidance for action. Consequently, Christian bioethics must be framed within the metaphysical and theological commitments of Traditional Christianity so as to provide proper orientation toward God. In contrast, secular bioethicists routinely present themselves as providing a universal bioethics acceptable to all reasonable and rational persons. Yet, such secular bioethicists habitually insert their own biases and prejudices into their moral conclusions, ethical consultations, and political aspirations, without any real justification. As this article explores, the ideologically driven anti-Christian commitments, including commitments to human rights and social justice, embodied within contemporary bioethics routinely illustrate the increasing gap between the traditionally Christian and the devoutly secular, further deepening the culture wars.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cherry, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:01:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/cb/cbp020</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Religion without God, Social Justice without Christian Charity, and Other Dimensions of the Culture Wars]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Journal of Christian Bioethics Inc</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>299</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>277</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>