Skip Navigation

Receive this page by email each issue: [Sign up for eTOCs]

Contents: Volume 7, Number 2, 2001   [Index by Author] 
Other Issues: Previous Next  

Down Original Articles


[Search ALL Issues]

To see an article, click its [Full Text] or [PDF] link. To review many abstracts, check the boxes to the left of the titles you want, and click the 'Get All Checked Abstract(s)' button. To see one abstract at a time, click its [Abstract] link.

Original Articles Back

Joseph Boyle
The Genesis of the Consensus Statement of the Working Group on Roman Catholic Approaches to Determining Appropriate Critical Care
Christ Bioeth 2001 7: 175-177; doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.175.3759 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Consensus Statement Working Group on Roman Catholic Approaches to Determining Appropriate Critical Care March, 2000
Christ Bioeth 2001 7: 179-184; doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.179.3757 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Lisa Sowle Cahill
Catholic Consensus on Critical Care, Patient Welfare and the Common Good
Christ Bioeth 2001 7: 185-192; doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.185.3752 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Laurie Zoloth
Limiting Access to Medical Treatment in an Age of Medical Progress: Developing a Catholic Consensus: A Response from Jewish Tradition
Christ Bioeth 2001 7: 193-201; doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.193.3748 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Gerald P. Mckenny
Critical Care Medicine and the Catholic Tradition: Reflections on the Consensus Statement
Christ Bioeth 2001 7: 203-209; doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.203.3756 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Kurt W. Schmidt
The Patient's Progress From this World to That Which is to Come: Commentary on the Consensus Statement of the Working Group on Roman Catholic Approaches to Determining Appropriate Critical Care
Christ Bioeth 2001 7: 211-225; doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.211.3750 [Abstract] [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Nicholas Capaldi
Consensus on Critical Care
Christ Bioeth 2001 7: 227-231; doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.227.3758 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Curtis W. Freeman
The Catholic Witness in a Post-Christendom Era
Christ Bioeth 2001 7: 233-237; doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.233.3754 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Stanley Hauerwas
Response to the ‘Consensus Statement of the Working Group on Roman Catholic Approaches to Determining Appropriate Critical Care’
Christ Bioeth 2001 7: 239-242; doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.239.3749 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Lawrence P. Ulrich
A Reaction to the Consensus Statement of the Working Group on Roman Catholic Approaches to Determining Appropriate Critical Care
Christ Bioeth 2001 7: 243-247; doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.243.3761 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

David M. Zientek
Response to the Consensus Statement of the Working Group on Roman Catholic Approaches to Determining Appropriate Critical Care
Christ Bioeth 2001 7: 249-257; doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.249.3760 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Luke Gormally
Some Observations on the Consensus Statement of the Working Group on Roman Catholic Approaches to Determining Appropriate Critical Care
Christ Bioeth 2001 7: 259-264; doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.259.3755 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Gerhold K. Becker
Practical Wisdom, Justice and Human Dignity: Some Comments on the Consensus Statement of the Working Group on Roman Catholic Approaches to Determining Appropriate Critical Care
Christ Bioeth 2001 7: 265-270; doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.265.3751 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

Patricio Ventura-Junca
A Commentary on the Consensus Statement of the Working Group on Roman Catholic Approaches to Determining Appropriate Critical Care
Christ Bioeth 2001 7: 271-289; doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.271.3747 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr.
Controversies, Conflicts, and Consensus: A Concluding, Untheological Postscript
Christ Bioeth 2001 7: 291-295; doi:10.1076/chbi.7.2.291.3753 [PDF] [Request Permissions]  

To see an article, click its [Full Text] or [PDF] link. To review many abstracts, check the boxes to the left of the titles you want, and click the 'Get All Checked Abstract(s)' button. To see one abstract at a time, click its [Abstract] link.