This article appears in the following Christian Bioethics issue: Elizabeth Anscombe's "Modern Moral Philosophy": Fifty Years Later [View the issue table of contents]
Contraception and Anesthesia: A Reply to James DuBois
St Michael's College, University of Toronto, Canada
Address correspondence to: Joseph Boyle, St Michael's College, 81 St Mary Street, Toronto, Canada ON M5S 1J4. E-mail: jboyle{at}chass.utoronto.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
This is a response to James Dubois "Is anesthesia intrinsically wrong?" I do not address many of the claims in this article but only DuBois use of the moral evaluation of the medical use of anesthesia as a counter example to two lines of reasoning developed to defend the traditional Catholic prohibition of contraception. Elizabeth Anscombe's dialectical defense of this teaching does not imply that such a defense must logically apply to the use of anesthesia. John Finnis defense of this teaching on the basis of a natural law argument does not imply that consciousness is a basic human good.
Keywords: basic human goods, contraception, contra-natural actions, natural law